Syndicate project reddit response3/21/2023 ![]() How were her comments not spreading inaccurate and misleading falsehoods? Investors lost a lot of money as a result. Today ex-chancellor Merkel is accused of having been naive for supporting and recommending Wirecard even after FT published their damming report. OK, we are talking about false content, so where does that leave the German government? Was information really better before social media platforms? The Financial Times reported that the giant German company Wirecard was a business that basically was laundering money for criminals, and so the German Justice Department prosecuted the FT for printing false content, when in fact the FT was right. But, of course, the same applies to the lone extremist who can now use the same platforms to access or propagate hate speech and conspiracy theories. If you are the only person in your community with an interest in ornithology, you no longer have to be alone, because you can now connect with ornithology enthusiasts from around the world. And more recent research has demonstrated that this process has a major influence on the type of information users see.Įven leaving aside Facebook’s algorithmic choices, the broader social-media ecosystem allows people to find subcommunities that align with their interests. Though users are not demanding misinformation, the algorithms that determine what people see tend to favor sensational, inaccurate, and misleading content, because that is what generates “engagement” and thus advertising revenue.Īs the internet activist Eli Pariser noted in 2011, Facebook also creates filter bubbles, whereby individuals are more likely to be presented with content that reinforces their own ideological leanings and confirms their own biases. On dominant social-media platforms like Facebook, researchers have documented that falsehoods spread faster and more widely than similar content that includes accurate information. upload video -add credit to description -receive 600k views -pay fair amount to the creator who spent the time actually creating the video.CAMBRIDGE – Not only are billions of people around the world glued to their mobile phones, but the information they consume has changed dramatically – and not for the better. It's incredible how someone with so much revenue and popularity has gotten so greedy over something which could have been solved in day one. Keep in mind that he's getting like 500 in profit from the video even if he did pay that, which he didn't. He mentions that he would probably only pay a max of $200. ![]() He acts like he is being singled out here and mentions the other big YouTubers: the others took it down shortly after, syndicate left his up to rack up 600k views. It literally takes one second, how hard is it to credit someone?Īnd you have 10million subscribers yet you don't question where this video is coming from when you upload it?! Surely you'd be more aware of the content you're sharing when distributing it to millions of people. I laughed out loud when he made it sound like that adding a link to makbot in the first line of the description was something crazy to ask for. on this video whilst hiding any negative comments. ![]() It's pretty obvious that he was getting keemstar to rally up his fans and astroturf the comments section with #facts etc. Yup he's clearly manic and can't take any negative reaction like a normal person.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |